Hogg by Delany
I just finished Hogg by Sam Delany. I spent the last hour looking at online reviews to see if anybody had anything interesting to say...I found little. I guess that means eventually I will have to write something about the book myself. I have been on the edge of tears since I finished it, and I can't exactly say why? Maybe it felt overwhelming? Maybe lately I have been trying to be more honest with myself about the world and body I inhabit? I am unsure. It is a novel narrated by an 11 year old boy who joins a gang of rapists for hire. I found myself having to put the book down every so often, but I always was compelled to pick it back up quickly thereafter.
I think the fact that the book deals with the supposedly darkest parts of human life, is what makes it feel so personal. For instance, " She was staring at me... I felt my face trying to mimic hers, as though that would let me know what was going on inside her." Have you done that before? Have you tried to imitate someone to understand them? Does it help? I think not, but we do it. Understanding others is a myth, we can't know what makes them tick. At the end Hogg believes cocksucker(the name of the main character) wishes nothing more to be with him, but cocksucker actually wants to be elsewhere, because the two men he was fucking in the docks had more dick cheese, and Hogg comes too often, 8-9 times a day, to build up the cheese that cocksucker likes. This may seem silly, but if we accept that there is no inherent meaning, and that we decide or are given our own meaning, than how is this different than if cocksucker "loved" these men. Again, Delany at his peak here is forcing the reader to deal with some very basic but often ignored questions.
The other thing I got from the novel was actual queerness. Not some fetishization of abnormal behaviors or of gayness. Instead, it was characters with fluid desires who realize them. This may seem "fucked up" and maybe it is, but it is against identity in a challenging way. Hogg explains his desires
"I think I ain't never met a normal, I mean normal, man who wasn't crazy! Loon crazy, take 'em off and put 'em away crazy, which is what they would do if there wasn't so many of them. Every normal man -- I mean sexually normal, now -- man I ever met figures the whole thing runs between two points: What he wants, and what he thinks should be. Every thought in his head is directed to fixing a rule-straight line between them, and he calls that line: What Is. [...] On the other hand, every faggot or panty-sucker, or whip jockey, or SM freak, or baby-fucker, or even a motherfucker like me, we know --" and his hands came down like he was pushing something away: "We know, man, that there is what we want, there is what should be, and there is what is: and don't none of them got anything to do with each other unless --"
DON'T NONE OF THEM GOT ANYTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
Delany also makes some social commentary which borders on the way Frank Wilderson discusses race and systems of control.
"Men hate bitches the way white men hate niggers. [...] Long as they do like we say they're suppose to do, everything always looks fine. But let one of them get even a little, teeny, weeny bit out of line, then you watch what happens -- we wanna kill. We may not kill, but we wanna kill. Well, if I was a bitch and knew what I know 'cause I ain't one, I'd get out there and start killin' first."
This is some feminist stuff from the 70's probably, but it also is an interesting way of critiquing post-racial america.
I will have more thoughts another time, but I needed to get some of this out.
I think the fact that the book deals with the supposedly darkest parts of human life, is what makes it feel so personal. For instance, " She was staring at me... I felt my face trying to mimic hers, as though that would let me know what was going on inside her." Have you done that before? Have you tried to imitate someone to understand them? Does it help? I think not, but we do it. Understanding others is a myth, we can't know what makes them tick. At the end Hogg believes cocksucker(the name of the main character) wishes nothing more to be with him, but cocksucker actually wants to be elsewhere, because the two men he was fucking in the docks had more dick cheese, and Hogg comes too often, 8-9 times a day, to build up the cheese that cocksucker likes. This may seem silly, but if we accept that there is no inherent meaning, and that we decide or are given our own meaning, than how is this different than if cocksucker "loved" these men. Again, Delany at his peak here is forcing the reader to deal with some very basic but often ignored questions.
The other thing I got from the novel was actual queerness. Not some fetishization of abnormal behaviors or of gayness. Instead, it was characters with fluid desires who realize them. This may seem "fucked up" and maybe it is, but it is against identity in a challenging way. Hogg explains his desires
"I think I ain't never met a normal, I mean normal, man who wasn't crazy! Loon crazy, take 'em off and put 'em away crazy, which is what they would do if there wasn't so many of them. Every normal man -- I mean sexually normal, now -- man I ever met figures the whole thing runs between two points: What he wants, and what he thinks should be. Every thought in his head is directed to fixing a rule-straight line between them, and he calls that line: What Is. [...] On the other hand, every faggot or panty-sucker, or whip jockey, or SM freak, or baby-fucker, or even a motherfucker like me, we know --" and his hands came down like he was pushing something away: "We know, man, that there is what we want, there is what should be, and there is what is: and don't none of them got anything to do with each other unless --"
DON'T NONE OF THEM GOT ANYTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
Delany also makes some social commentary which borders on the way Frank Wilderson discusses race and systems of control.
"Men hate bitches the way white men hate niggers. [...] Long as they do like we say they're suppose to do, everything always looks fine. But let one of them get even a little, teeny, weeny bit out of line, then you watch what happens -- we wanna kill. We may not kill, but we wanna kill. Well, if I was a bitch and knew what I know 'cause I ain't one, I'd get out there and start killin' first."
This is some feminist stuff from the 70's probably, but it also is an interesting way of critiquing post-racial america.
I will have more thoughts another time, but I needed to get some of this out.